How to build reliable data pipelines with data quality checks

High-quality data is the foundation of trustworthy analytics. But without automated checks, even modern pipelines can quietly deliver incomplete, stale, or incorrect information—leading to costly business decisions.

This post walks through how to implement practical, scalable data quality checks in your pipelines. You’ll learn the key dimensions of data quality, which tests matter most, where to place them in development and production, and how tools like dbt can help you enforce standards with automation and CI/CD.

Understanding data quality dimensions

Before you can enforce data quality, you need to define what “quality” means in context. Here are the core dimensions that form a practical framework:

• Accuracy (Correctness): Does the data reflect real-world values? For example, a product’s listed price should match its actual sale price.
• Completeness: Are all required fields populated? Missing IDs, emails, or timestamps can break downstream processes.
• Validity: Does the data conform to expected formats, ranges, or business rules? Think of dates, enum values, or transaction types.
• Consistency: Are values uniform across systems and datasets? Inconsistent naming or duplication introduces conflict and confusion.
• Freshness (Timeliness): Is the data current enough to support decisions? Delayed updates make reports misleading.
• Uniqueness: Are entities (like order IDs or user accounts) represented only once? Duplicates lead to inflated metrics or failed joins.

Together, these dimensions help you define what “good” looks like for your data. By embedding checks that enforce them throughout your pipelines, you build trust—not just in your data, but in the decisions it drives.

Essential data quality checks for your pipelines

Implementing a few strategic tests can catch most issues before they impact business decisions. Here are the foundational data quality checks every team should include:

Uniqueness tests

Duplicate data distorts analysis and leads to incorrect business insights. Uniqueness tests make sure values in key columns appear only once in your dataset. For example, in a sales system, order IDs should never be duplicated, as this could cause revenue to be counted twice.

These tests are straightforward to implement in most data tools. When a uniqueness test fails, it immediately signals potential data corruption or process issues that require attention. Regular uniqueness checks prevent downstream reporting errors.

Implementing uniqueness checks early in your pipeline catches problems before they spread through your data ecosystem. These checks form a basic but critical part of your data quality system.

Non-null tests

Missing values in critical fields can break processes and create incomplete insights. Non-null tests verify that essential data is always present. For instance, in customer records, fields like ID, email, and signup date typically must contain values.

These tests help catch data entry issues or system failures that lead to incomplete records. Data with proper completion rates is more reliable for analysis and operational use. Non-nullness tests are simple to implement but deliver significant value.

By ensuring critical fields are always populated, you prevent many common data problems before they affect business operations.

Accepted values tests

Data often needs to fall within specific categories or ranges to be meaningful. Accepted values tests enforce these boundaries. For example, a financial system might need all transaction types to be one of "deposit", "withdrawal", or "transfer" – any other value would indicate a problem.

These tests catch both technical failures and user input errors. They help maintain data consistency across systems and prevent nonsensical analysis. When combined with business rules, they ensure data matches operational reality.

Implementing accepted values tests creates guardrails that keep your data aligned with business expectations and technical requirements.

Referential integrity tests

As data moves through transformations, relationships between tables must remain intact. Referential integrity tests verify that foreign keys in one table exist as primary keys in related tables. For instance, every product ID in a sales table should exist in the products master table.

When these relationships break, reports can show incomplete information or fail entirely. Maintaining proper connections between data entities ensures accurate joins and aggregations. These tests help prevent the "missing data" problems that often puzzle end users.

Regular referential integrity checks maintain the connectedness of your data model, making all downstream analysis more reliable.

Freshness and recency tests

Outdated information can lead to poor decisions. Freshness tests verify that data is updated on schedule and remains current. For instance, a sales dashboard becomes useless if yesterday's transactions haven't loaded properly.

These tests often check timestamps to ensure recent updates have occurred. They can trigger alerts when data flows stop or slow down. Freshness checks are particularly important for time-sensitive business processes.

By monitoring the timeliness of your data, you ensure business users always have current information for decision-making.

Where to implement data quality checks

During development

Quality starts with good design. Implementing checks during development helps catch issues before they hit production. Developers should explore raw source data to understand its baseline quality, then test transformations to ensure they preserve or improve that quality.

Test-driven development (TDD) works well for data. Write tests before building transformations to clarify expected outcomes and catch logic errors early.

Early checks create a solid foundation for reliable downstream analytics.

During pull requests

Code review is a critical gate for quality. Running automated tests during pull requests (PRs) ensures changes won’t break existing models or dashboards.

PRs are an ideal time to validate assumptions, review test coverage, and ensure new logic integrates cleanly with the existing project. With dbt Cloud, you can enable CI jobs to run your tests on every pull request—automatically.

Making tests part of your merge criteria helps shift data quality left and builds a stronger team culture around trust.

In production

Even with perfect development workflows, things can break in production. Scheduled tests in your production environment catch issues from upstream schema changes, unexpected edge cases, or pipeline failures.

Production tests should run after every data refresh and before dashboards or reports go live. Use alerts to notify the right people when issues arise—and block data from flowing downstream if needed.

Ongoing production validation ensures your data stays accurate as systems evolve.

Best practices for data quality implementation

Start simple and expand

Start with high-impact tests—like uniqueness and non-null constraints—on your most critical tables. These catch common issues quickly and deliver immediate value.

As your framework matures, layer in more sophisticated checks (e.g., accepted values, referential integrity). This incremental approach keeps the implementation manageable and builds team momentum.

Early wins help build trust in the process and secure buy-in for deeper investment in quality.

Automate testing

Manual checks don’t scale. Automating your data quality tests ensures consistency across datasets and frees up engineers to focus on higher-value work.

Most modern data platforms—including dbt—offer native testing frameworks that integrate seamlessly with your transformation workflows.

Automation creates a safety net that works even as teams, tools, or data change.

Alert on failures

Testing is only useful if someone sees the results. Set up alerts to notify the right stakeholders when issues arise—whether through email, Slack, or incident response tools.

Tailor alerts based on severity. Some failures might trigger automated data blocks; others might open tickets for triage.

Proactive alerting turns passive monitoring into active data reliability management.

Document your tests

Clear documentation helps everyone understand what tests exist and why they matter. For each quality check, document what it verifies, why it's important, and what action to take if it fails.

This documentation serves both immediate operational needs and onboarding of new team members. It preserves knowledge about data expectations even as teams change. Good documentation also helps business users understand the quality measures protecting their data.

Treating test documentation as a first-class deliverable improves team alignment and operational response to issues.

Common challenges and solutions

Implementing data quality checks isn’t without its challenges. Some of the most common issues include:

Handling exceptions. Not all data that fails a rule is wrong—edge cases, legacy formats, or evolving business logic may require flexibility. Instead of weakening standards across the board, consider scoped exceptions or custom tests that handle these cases without sacrificing trust.

Balancing coverage with performance. Comprehensive testing can slow data delivery. Focus frequent checks on critical fields and logic, while running heavier validations during off-peak hours or staging environments.

Adapting to change. As your business evolves, so do your schemas and expectations. Design your test framework to be modular and easy to update, so your quality coverage evolves with your data.

Fostering a culture of quality. Perhaps the hardest challenge is cultural. When teams see testing as overhead, adoption suffers. The shift happens when quality is clearly tied to business outcomes—like faster delivery, fewer dashboard errors, and higher trust in data.

Conclusions

Robust data quality checks are essential to building trust in your analytics and driving confident business decisions. By focusing on key quality dimensions—like accuracy, completeness, and freshness—and placing checks strategically throughout your pipelines, you can significantly improve data reliability.

Start simple, automate where possible, and set up alerting so issues are surfaced and resolved quickly. As your systems evolve, so should your tests. Treating quality as a continuous process, not a one-time task, ensures long-term resilience.

The payoff? Less time firefighting, faster insights, and stronger trust across your organization.

🔗 Want to start testing your data today? Explore how dbt automates testing and monitoring.

Data quality FAQs